|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
The god father
By JOSEPHINE MINUTILLO photographs
by philippe bialobos
Philippe Starck insists he’s an
outsider to the world of design.
But just as he thinks he is out, we keep
pulling him back in.
Certain people have been so inextricably
linked to their profession that their names are nearly
synonymous with what they do. Any discussion of computer
software would be incomplete without a mention of Bill Gates.
And what can one say about basketball without bringing up
Michael Jordan? Ditto soccer and Pelé, classical music
and Mozart, ballet and Baryshnikov. For over three decades now,
one name has defined design and become a household word.
Philippe Starck = Design. His fame has gone beyond the inner
circles of the design cognoscenti to make him a celebrity in
the true sense of the word, landing him not only in the design
rags but also the tabloids, especially in his native France.
Yet Starck insists that he is
an outsider. He is ashamed of what he
does. He hasn’t asked for any of this. Are we to believe
him?
We sat down with the globe-trotting
designer during a whirlwind visit he made to New York this
spring to promote Gramercy, a new Manhattan condo building
featuring his Yoo by Starck interior design. While much of what
he had to say sounded awfully familiar (How could it not when
so much has already been written about him?), the affable
auteur opened up about everything from sex and God and
guerrilla warfare to something he finds somewhat less
interesting . . . design.
WHITEWALL: Over the years, so many
designers have said they look to you as an influence, a role
model, so to speak — designers as different as Konstantin
Grcic and Marcel Wanders. You’re the man.
PHILIPPE STARCK: Oh, good. I love that
— in English, you made my day.
WW: Do you find it interesting, though,
that you’ve had such an impact on such a varied group?
What does that make you feel?
PS: Nothing. You know, I’m sorry to
repeat myself, but I’m really not interested in design.
That’s why I’m not interested if people say
something is good or bad. Thank you if it’s good, but if
they say it’s bad it’s the same thing. I am not
interested in design for the design, or the product for the
product. I try to escape from materiality. I am only interested
in the effect of what I produce. That’s why I am obliged
to make so many things, because in order to have a global
effect you must make a lot of things. A journalist can change
society with one article, a politician with one vote, a singer
with one song—because those are strong, direct vehicles
of expression. Design is exactly the contrary. It’s
sticky, heavy, slow, and mute. I am completely out of the
design world. I can say that design chose me more than I chose
design. I am ashamed to be a Christmas gift designer with
fantastic success with a toothbrush and a toilet brush.
I’m not a believer, but I’m afraid of the image
when I shall die and arrive in front of God, and he says to me,
“And you, you are very well known, but I’m sorry I
don’t understand why you are so known. What have you
made?” and I shall say, “a toothbrush.”
WW: I have that toothbrush in my bathroom,
but I’ve never used it.
PS: It’s a good toothbrush. It works
well.
|
|
||||||||||
|
Fall 2007
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
![]() |
|
||||||||||
![]() |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
![]() |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
